Posted 3 days ago
Posted 3 days ago

is-the-post-reliable:

thewelllitweenie:

ungezieferwerden:

anneemay:

You can’t believe how kind the British are.  Every morning, a van pulls up outside your house in Coventry. A friendly man brings you a freshly-baked flatbread to eat.  It’s just for you,not anyone else in your family. Every afternoon he comes back to make sure you’ve eaten it. 1/ pic.twitter.com/cAOKEGTiw9  — Dr Louise Raw (@LouiseRawAuthor) August 19, 2023ALT
image
image

British government put radioactive salt on chapati that they fed to Punjabi mothers in Oxfordshire in the 1970s

What in the fuck

[Image ID: A series of tweets from Dr Louise Raw @LouiseRawAuthor. The tweets read, ‘You can’t believe how kind the British are. Every morning, a van pulls up outside your house in Coventry. A friendly man brings you a freshly-baked flatbread to eat. It’s just for you, not anyone else in your family. Every afternoon he comes back to make sure you’ve eaten it.

It’s to improve your health, because you went to your GP with migraines. He said it could be anaemia, & these special chapatis will help you. You’re grateful: you haven’t been here long, & really appreciate your new country looking after you. Eventually another van comes.

It takes you, young Punjabi mum Pritam Kour, to what you’re told is a hospital, supposedly to see if this new health food is helping. They never tell you the strange building is actually the Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell, Oxfordshire. There they put you in a machine 'like a box’. You hear a clicking noise. Then they take you home. You don’t speak much English but you express your gratitude again. All this just to help you. It’s wonderful. That was in 1969. In the 1990s, local reporter Sukhbender Singh, gets wind of a story.

Filmmaker @John Brownlow can’t believe what he uncovers. It has to be exposed. Pritam & 20 other Punjabi women had been fed RADIOACTIVE SALTS in those chapatis: never told, let alone asked. The illegal experiment was conducted by the MEDICAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (MRC).’ Four images are included: a picture of chapatis, a picture of a woman who is presumably Pritam Kour, a black and white picture of three scientists using some sort of equipment, and an illustration of a hand reaching towards a chapati. /End ID]




requested by anonymous:

RATING: PARTIALLY RELIABLE

Firstly, a quick assessment of the sources available here. The article above is from India Today, which is rated as Mixed for factual reporting according to MBFC due to multiple failed fact checks. Furthermore, the India Today article mostly cites a documentary (Deadly Experiments), which you can watch here on youtube.

Documentaries are not a reliable source, as there is no code of ethics, and they are not obligated to keep things factual.

Source: 'It’s not just that the definition of “documentary” itself is mutable: unlike other journalistic and quasi-journalistic forms, no code of ethics has ever been agreed upon by practitioners of the art, and what rules of thumb there are tend to be temporary, controversial and broken as soon as they are made.’


As this research happened in 1969 (according to the India Times article and the documentary - the caption to the tweets claim the 1970’s), it has not been easy to find a lot of reliable information on this. However, after much searching, I did find the published paper in question!

The paper is entitled Absorption of Iron from Chapatti Made from Wheat Flour. It is not about the study of radiation, as implied by the tweets, but in fact was studying anaemia and whether supplementing food with iron salts could help iron absorption in South-Asian diets.

Source: 'In many countries in which iron deficiency is a serious problem, cereals are eaten as foods such as chapatti or tortillas, which are made from an unfermented dough. The following study was conducted, therefore, to estimate the availability of naturally occurring wheat iron and of an iron salt added as a supplement to flour from chapatti made from white flour, and from chapatti made from wholemeal flour.’

The chapatis were supplemented with small amounts of iron salt (ferric ammonium citrate), to see whether this could help with low blood iron levels/iron deficiency anaemia. Radioactive isotopes were used - however, this is not as alarming as the tweets suggest. It is common practice to use radioactive isotopes in medicine as a tracer, and this practice is not considered harmful or dangerous.

Source: 'Nuclear medicine uses radioactive isotopes in a variety of ways. One of the more common uses is as a tracer in which a radioisotope, such as technetium-99m, is taken orally or is injected or is inhaled into the body. The radioisotope then circulates through the body or is taken up only by certain tissues. Its distribution can be tracked according to the radiation it gives off. […] Radioisotopes typically have short half-lives and typically decay before their emitted radioactivity can cause damage to the patient’s body.’

Whether the participants of the study gave informed consent is not something I am able to fully assess. One of the participants, Pritam Kaur, claimed that she was not told about the iron salts/radioactive tracer, whilst a spokesperson for the MRC has denied this, and claimed that a translator was always present to ensure informed consent was given.

Overall, it does not seem that this research was definitely 'illegal’ as the tweets claim. The major concern is whether the study was properly explained to the participants, allowing them to give informed consent.

The actual methodology and purpose of the study are common and considered to meet ethics standards, unlike other historical medical experiments. (For example, the British Military of Defence’s unethical testing of nerve gas, or the infamous Tuskegee Syphillis Study, which secretly prevented African American men with syphillis from accessing treatment so that they could study untreated syphillis.)

In summary, the tweets do not accurately portray the study. Whilst there is a real concern regarding whether the participants fully understood what they were consenting to, and therefore able to give informed consent, the study was researching iron absorption, not the effects of radioactivity. Radioactive isotopes are not considered dangerous when used as tracers. Whilst unethical and harmful experimentation on racial minorities has historically occurred, this specific instance was not likely to have caused the participants any physical harm.

Posted 6 days ago

polkadotmotmot:

image

Emilia Nurmivaara - Chamber of Being, 2023

Posted 1 week ago

blujaynoodles:

wistfulelfgirl:

lesbian sex that looks like a big cartoon ball of dust with the occasional leg sticking out and i crawl out of it covered in lipstick kisses and get swiftly dragged back in

image
image
image
Posted 1 week ago

thelesbiansuperjesus:

We aren’t talking about muppets goncharov as much as we should be. Like dont lie I know you guys also watched it as a kid despite it being a straight to dvd bargain bin kinda movie. That shit was gold. I don’t care if it was essentially a high budget shitpost it was my childhood. Kermit as gonch?! Priceless. moment of the century. The inclusion of the clocks?! Literal art. When I tell you the muppets team knew what they were doing, *they knew what they were doing*

Don’t forget Beaker and Bunsen as a two-man Icepick Joe! Ridiculous, but they stole the show.

Posted 1 week ago

attackofopportunity:

attackofopportunity:

attackofopportunity:

attackofopportunity:

Walnuts is planning something as a surprise for my birthday. 

I don’t know what it is, except that it probably involves some other people. I only think it might involve some other people because both my sister’s best friend and my own father have innocently tried to ruin the surprise for me.

Fortunately, I love being surprised, so if I know someone’s planning something, I never try to spy or to extrapolate. I haven’t looked at the transaction history in the bank app because I have a feeling there’s probably some sort of evidence in it. I’m happily walking around blinkered for the next couple weeks. 

I am desperately in love and am deeply loved.

My dad at dinner last night: ::starts to ask a question::

Walnuts:

image

My sister on the phone: ::starts to talk about her travel schedule::

Me:

image

Walnuts: ::successfully throws me a surprise party at a nice hotel near an event I love featuring a bunch of our friends::

Me:

image

Walnuts: And there’s more to come!

Me: 

image

To conclude the saga……..

Walnuts: ::takes me to dinner at my favorite restaurant and spends the night and following day, my actual birthday, in a beach town with me::

Me:

image

Originally posted by sorbet-sharks

Posted 1 week ago
Posted 1 week ago

stigmateo:

albertserra:

albertserra:

Men don’t go heyyyybatterbatterswingbatterbatterswing like they used to anymore

image

We can’t have anything in this fucking world

love this person knowing enough about baseball to know about the pitch clock and not enough to even approximate the league’s acronym

Posted 1 week ago

were–ralph:

image

good morning to fat men only

Posted 1 week ago

doomed-bythe-narrative:

some people are taking “doomed” to mean “dead”. this is actually a misconception! you can be doomed even if you don’t die! it’s sometimes worse if you don’t die!

Posted 1 week ago

chibird:

image

Mini bee is still small but has grown so much!

Chibird store | Positive pin club | Instagram

Posted 1 week ago

cheeseanonioncrisps:

glorious-spoon:

normal-with-adhd-is-a-joke:

haonsowmqpoznwk:

image

This is the bare minimum of decent human behavior for ANY gender. If you are an adult and someone who is not an adult wants to have a relationship with you, it is your duty to, at bare minimum, turn them away.

and like… having crushes on adults is a Normal Adolescent Thing, but it doesn’t mean they’re ready for–or for that matter, want–an actual relationship with said adult. it’s a goddamn developmental phase for kids working out their sexuality, and treating it as a chance to get laid is fucking monstrous.

Same reason why when a younger kid tries to playfully fight with you, the appropriate response is not to sweep the leg, get them on the ground and then start kicking.

Posted 1 week ago

animatedamerican:

silvergryphon:

faustandfurious:

Basic rules for analysing fiction, an incomprehensive list jotted down in a hurry:

  1. The protagonist isn’t always right
  2. The protagonist isn’t always good
  3. The protagonist isn’t always written to be relatable or likeable
  4. The narrator isn’t always right
  5. The narrator isn’t always good
  6. The narrator isn’t always telling the truth
  7. The narrator isn’t always the author
  8. The protagonist’s moral compass, the narrator’s moral compass and the author’s moral compass are three entirely different things that only occasionally overlap
  9. Pay attention to what characters do and not just what they say
  10. Pay special attention when what the characters do is at odds with what they say
  11. A lot of the time the curtains are blue for a reason. If they aren’t, you should read better books

One more:

12. The antagonist isn’t always telling the truth

So many times I have seen people apparently just … forget that it’s possible for fictional characters to be (a) mistaken or (b) lying, and say things like “we know this to be true because [character] said so here” (or, worse, “this fact is canon because [character] said it”).

The antagonist isn’t always telling the truth, the protagonist isn’t always telling the truth, the secondary and minor characters aren’t always telling the truth, the narrator may be telling the truth but if the narrator is also a character in the story then don’t count on it.

Posted 1 week ago

putaqrofthisonmygrave:

I give anyone reading this permission to use my grave to lie to cops

Posted 1 week ago

boyfront:

ok follow up from my last poll

whats the strongest alcohol youve drank *and enjoyed*

pre-mix cans (>5% alc vol)

beer/cider

cocktail

wine

vodka

tequila

gin

rum

cream liqueur

whiskey

other kind of liquor/spirit

i dont drink/havent enjoyed any alcoholic drink ive tried

**if the drink was mixed with more than 1 other non-alcoholic drink then just pick cocktail, but if it was something like a vodka & coke (or u drank it straight lol) then pick whatever

also if u pick other tell me in the tags/replies what it was!